Showing posts with label T Tales. Show all posts
Showing posts with label T Tales. Show all posts

Friday, March 02, 2007

T Tales: Friday woes reported all over the system

We received several reports at charlieonthembta@gmail.com that Friday morning didn't go very well for some commuters.

Adam reports of a major snafu at Natick
Several months ago, I wrote in to MBCR customer service expressing my concern for the horrendous track and platform conditions at Natick Station (inbound track 2). I was given some lip service about being aware of these issues but despite the fact that the tracks have not stopped flooding for FOUR months, of course nothing was done about it.

Today, March 2, the steady rain caused high water and the track became impassible. Somehow, no one notified the engineer of train P514 who stopped the train just short of the station, reversed direction, and showed up on the opposite track 60 minutes later (having had to back up all the way to Framingham to switch tracks!).

To make matters worse, none of the passengers waiting at Natick or other inbound stations had any information about the delay, as the SmartTraveler line and LED boards did not report any delays to the line, and the MBTA customer support representative I spoke with told me there were "no problems" on the line.

How can any of this be considered acceptable? All of these delays COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED while simple communication, which is frequently promised but NEVER delivered, failed miserably.
Is it any wonder that the Framingham/Worcester line has suffered the largest decline in ridership? This sounds like another classic CSX horror story as they dispatch the commuter rail trains on that line from Albany, NY.

Sue from Newton writes about the D Line Friday morning
It was (as forecast) raining hard and very windy in
Greater Boston, pouring rain onto slush, so I wasn’t
surprised when I came down to the Newton Centre T this
morning to find a crew of T representatives zooming
about. Some of them with road cones. Uh-oh.

According to one rep there were wires down on the
line. They were running trains inbound and shuttle
buses out to Riverside.

The train went inbound OK, except that instead of
switching tracks before the Reservoir platform, for
some reason the train passed the platform; the driver
shut the train down and switched to the other end;
drove the train back to the right past the platform;
changed ends again; and drove out to Government
Center. Weird, inefficient and unexplained, but no
problem for the passengers other than a few minutes’
delay.

A friend of mine who also lives on the D / Riverside
line did not have my luck. When he came to the
station the T was not only running shuttle buses both
ways, but making people wait down Langley Road, in the
driving cold rain far from the station and shelter,
for the buses. (Obviously this was a different crew
from the one a couple weeks ago that offered to let
passengers get on the buses to get out of the weather.
What, did they get in trouble for accommodating
passenger comfort? Or did the bus drivers just not
feel like going through the turn-around on Union
Street in front of the station?) There was a long
wait for the buses and also a long wait for a train at
Reservoir, where many, many people were waiting. The
train had to be packed like a sardine can when it
finally arrived.

They never seem to anticipate these problems.

Incidents like this will become especially fun when
they start running the new Breda cars (which seat
about half as many people and have an upper and lower
level connected by steps -- increasing the chances
people can fall) on the Riverside line.
I also heard from John, Kathie and Bill with similar stories.

Zachary reports the trackless trolleys on Mt Auburn St were having a bad day as well
Hiya, Charlie,

This morning at about 9:15, the 71 and 73 buses, which run from Harvard Square to Watertown Square and Waverly Square, respectively, stopped running. At first we all thought it was our own individual bus. Then I noticed another bus about 100 yards ahead, had also stopped. The driver said that they had lost power to the overhead trolley lines. She said there was no word on whether a 'relief' bus would come to pick up stranded passengers, saying, "they wouldn't tell me that, anyway."

I was able to call my boss, who came to pick me up. I was going outbound, which means you pay as you disembark, but either the power to the Charlie boxes was out, or the driver didn't care, because everyone who left did so without paying. As my boss and I drove down Mt. Auburn St, we saw dozens of buses that were simply sitting there with nowhere to go, the passengers either stubbornly remaining on board or running to the nearby Shaw's. This was about 20 minutes after the buses stopped initially.

There never was a travel advisory on the T website. Nothing indicating that any delay had occurred. Of course, things may have got rolling soon afterwards, but those buses may still be out there - I'm trying to figure it out before I sit out in the rain for a bus that won't come! Tried calling the MBTA switchboard, but apparently Friday afternoon is their "heavy call volume" time - is that some sort of joke?

Anyway, another T Tale. Thanks for your great blog!
It does appear that the T doesn't have a fluid system in place to get delay information from the High Street operations center posted onto the web. We have seen the same delays in updating info ( when they even bother ) on the Commuter Rail. The T promises that soon we will have SMS updates and real time tracking of buses on the website. I'm not holding my breath given the failure the T has had on the Silver Line doing so.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

T Tales: A fun night on the 426

Matt sends in his T Tale from last Friday night to charlieonthembta@gmail.com
On Friday night I took the 426 home from Haymarket. There were three
people waiting at the Linden Sq. stop, one of whom walked out into
the middle of the street, anticipating that the bus would stop in
such a way as to allow the prospective passengers to board without
climbing over an ice sheet.

The driver waved her away and then drove around near, coming very
close to hitting her.

When the three passengers came into the bus they began verbally
accosting the bus driver. He retorted with some colorful language
while defending his act of stopping at the designated stop instead of
a slightly more convenient location. This continued until all the
passengers got off at their stops. I also got off with the last of
those passengers, and I was the only one on the bus not screaming.


That sounds like it was a memorable trip.

I maybe wrong on this but I believe it is the CITY and not the T that is responsible for clearing out bus stops. I say this because both Boston and Cambridge have contracted with companies to provide bus shelters.

Sadly I have seen this play out on other bus routes the past few days as most bus stops were in sorry, sorry shape in the Cambridge area.

T Tales - a rider leaves a rant

I will be traveling until Thursday noontime and I may not be able to update the blog until then as my wireless card is not working as it should. However please continue to e-mail us.

Also the recent comments summary is currently not working showing the last comments as of February 6th. This is a system wide issue with blogspot and google is aware of the problem and it should be fixed shortly.


from the mailbag at charlieonthembta@gmail.com Andreas is fed up
Hey,
So i put five dollers in the farebox, and it takes all my money without
giving me a charlieticket. I get some complaint form which i need to mail
in to get my money which will probably never come.

I'm riding the D Line a few days ago and I hit the stop request button and
it skips my stop!

At another time, I cross the tracks in front of a boarding train, in plain
sight and the train moves on as soon as I'm off the tracks and about to get
on, making me wait another 10 minutes in the cold.

The train waits 10 minutes at Fenway with no announcements, and after 5
minutes the conductor of the train(car #2) gets out of the train and onto
the platform, people file on for free and then the train makes some loud
noises and gets on its way.

From a person who now bikes instead of riding the T.
We are hearing about ( and have seen first hand ) problems with the fareboxes adding value to CharlieCards. I can tell you that the T has been good in issuing refunds quickly to customers this has happened.

There seems to be a problem with people hitting the stop request on a second car of a Breda trolley and the driver in the first car not knowing about it. A Green Line motorman confirmed to me this is an issue and just said "it is yet another bug in these Bredas".

Friday, February 02, 2007

T Tales: New North Station not ready for prime time


North Station unveils new renovations (02/01/2007) VIDEO from 7News


Peg drops a note to charlieonthembta@gmail.com about the "new and improved" North Station

think the T might have jumped the gun a bit in their ‘ribbon cutting’ for the expanded and improved waiting area at North Station. Last evening, trying to catch a 4:30 train, I ran into the new area at about 4:27, looking for an electronic monitor to tell me what track to go to…..oh wait, there are no monitors in the new area, just a large digital cartoon of the Bunker Hill Bridge and an ad for Banknorth. Suddenly though, a garbled voice announces (I think) the 4:30 train to screech!@garble& now loading on ???...Where, thought I, is that coming from? Overhead?? Behind me in the older part of the station? Apparently, there are no speakers in the new area either. Oh well, no time to spare, I run out to the boarding area to read the monitor at track side to see which track and then turn right to go to track 3….Ooooops! Orange cones and yellow ‘do not cross’ tape is strung across the head of the platform parallel to the tracks, but blocking access to adjacent boarding areas. I stood in muted frustration as I watched my train depart, and dejectedly went back to sit on one of the new benches to wait for the next train. Gee, I guess I SHOULD be happy that there was a place to sit! Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarghh!!!
Does sound like they rushed the opening a bit. The ironic thing is media coverage was almost non-existent of the opening because it occurred just as invasion of the Cartoon Network was happening. Still it is a huge improvement over what north side commuters have had to deal with the past 12 years.



T Tales: 40 minutes from Kenmore to Government Center

CME writes us at charlieonthembta@gmail.com about her trip on the Green Line Friday morning

This may explain why I waited 25 minutes at Park for a Riverside train today.
Here's (part of?) why there was a huge backup on the green line this
morning.

I commute from Allston to Government Center, and this morning I was lucky
enough to get a 57 to Kenmore. When I hit the platform, there was a
pretty big crowd standing around looking impatient, so it seems something
was already delayed.

We waited about 10 minutes for a train, which, after we'd all piled on,
did the thing where it closed and then reopened its doors. This is
Kenmore-station speak for "This train will be standing by". A couple of
passengers made angry noises and jumped off the train in favor of the
other inbound train that had just arrived across the platform.

Our train pulled out a few minutes later and stopped, as they usually do,
in the tunnel right after Kenmore where the track takes a large, non-flat
curve to the left. And it stayed there. And stayed there. And of
course, the lights and the ventillation kept shutting off like they do
when the train isn't moving. At this point, there were quiet funny noises
coming from the front of the car/train (I'm not sure which, I was in the
back of the second car) as the drivers tried to reboot the train.
Finally, the PA system beeped, there was a long slince, and a grumpy voice
said "-workin' on it". Everyone around me gave an annoyed laugh at how
uninformative this was.

After a few more minutes of waiting, we heard voices in the tunnel outside
the train. Suddenly someone banged violently on the doors next to me
(rear doors on the righthand side), and all of the passengers nearby
jumped away from the door in alarm. The guy outside forced the doors open
and jumped on, panting like steam engine, then forced them closed behind
him. He pulled out his keychain and unlocked the platic panel covering
the control circuits over the door (this was a Breda Type 8 car), reached
in, violently threw a few levers back and forth, and in his hurry nearly
dropped the panel on the heads of the surrounding passengers. (It was
really great to see someone treating the problem like it mattered, but he
was as wound up as if someone were being injured, which was disconcerting
and causing him to make mistakes like almost braining a dozen passengers.)

It turns out that there was a fault in the door control circuitry such
that the door registered as open even though it wasn't, and the train's
safety systems wouldn't allow it to move with an "open" door. The T guy
repair guy had "isolated" the door; I assume this is T-speak for "turning
it off". They dumped us on the platform at Hynes and took the train out
of service; radio traffic from the repair guy indicated that that the
train would be taken to Park St without passengers so it could be removed
from service.

I was then on two more trains that were turned early; the one I got on at
Hynes (after skipping the first to come through) was turned at Park, and
the North Station train after that was turned at Goverment Center- by the
high-tech method of a T guy standing on the Government Center platform and
stopping the train to tell the driver this was his last stop. If I'd been
going farther than Government Center I'd have *really* been ready to spit
nails. As it was, total time from hitting the Kenmore platform to
Government Center? 40 minutes. You can bet I'll be filing an on-time
service claim.

cme

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Charlie's Mailbag - T Tales (January 25, 2007)

From the mailbag at charlieonthembta@gmail we have a couple of "T Tales" to share.

I just want to let readers know that some mailbag entries concerning CharlieCards have been posted in Charlie comment thread. No email gets ignored here.

Lets see what is on the minds of commuters:


Ben writes
Hi, I've been enjoying your blog. Here's my Charlie Card story...

I usually do a quick T commute from Kendall to Central then walk the
rest of the way home. One day last week I had to go into Boston to
meet some friends. Out of habit went to the wrong side of Kendall, and
after I went through the gate said 'oops' and crossed Main Street to
the inbound side of the station. I tried the gate, but my monthly pass
is now denied, with a little note saying I have to wait 20 minutes. I
asked the attendant, and she "NO YOU CAN'T GO THROUGH TWICE, BUY A
TICKET!!" Totally unprovoked she was yelling at me. I pointed out this
was a valid monthly pass I'd paid a lot of money for and she closed
the window on me.

I am just outraged to be treated so poorly. It's not just the rude
personnel, it's the idea that I can't use my monthly pass for 20
minutes after using the first time ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STATION. I
can't be the first person this has happened to. It seems the T just
assumes a I am trying to rip them off.

I understand the reason for the time limit to prevent a passholder from letting several people using the pass at the same time. Still in a case like Kendall where outbound and inbound have separate access areas they should just program the readers to reject cards used on that side of the platform. There are only a handful of stations in the system where this is an issue (for example Kendall, Central, Copley, Boylston)and it is easy for a commuter to enter the wrong side by mistake. This is something the T can and should fix easily.

Ariel's problem was more of a head scratcher
(This happened on January 22)

At 5:30, I left work. I had rehearsal in Porter Square at 7:30 and had an hour and a half to kill. so I arranged to meet my friend Al at Spike's in Davis between 6:15 and 6:30.

I get to South Station in plenty of time, but when I try to boop/ding my pass to let me through, the machine makes this loud noise and denies me by saying "not enough stored value." That's funny, I think to myself, because LinkPass, which I have, doesn't have stored value. It just lets you through if you're in the right month.


So I try every single turnstile, and none will let me through. I go to the purchasing machines and tap my card to see what the machine thinks I have on my card. Bing! You have a monthly LinkPass for January. So, hoping that the purchasing somehow reset the card since it knows I have a monthly LinkPass, I try again to get through with no luck at any turnstile. So I go and put $10 on my CharlieCard, because I have to ride from South Station to Davis, from Davis to Porter, from Porter to home, and then home to work tomorrow before I can go deal with this.


I add the money and it works. I am let through and now I have $8.30 left. Now I spot an MBTA employee, who was nowhere to be found before. I go up to him and tell him that I purchased a LinkPass for January, which worked perfectly up until today, but now registers as "not enough stored value" to pass through, even though the purchasing machine knows and recognizes that I have a LinkPass. I told him I bought $10 worth to get me through the next couple days in case I couldn't fix it, but could he please try to see if he could reset it somehow and have my LinkPass re-recognized.

He dings/boops my card to the machine to investigate and enters his MBTA employee super secret machine access code. "You have $8.30 on this card. You're fine!" at which point I had to tell him again that I just bought that $10, and had to use $1.70 to get in the turnstile to talk to him, and that that is not the problem. The problem is that the turnstile machine doesn't recognize my LinkPass and I don't want to pay $35 more dollars just to be able to go to work for the rest of January, which I already paid $59 for.

He checks the card again and he's like, "You have a LinkPass on here. You're fine!" Then I was like, I know I have a LinkPass. I have the receipt for it. The problem is the turnstile doesn't recognize my LinkPass and won't let me through. "But you came through. You're fine!" Then I had to re-explain why I put the $10 on there in the first place.

He screws around with the machine a bit more and announces he can't help me. He takes me to his supervisor, who is huddled over a desk in the tinted-window booth in the subway part of South Station. I give my card and my receipt for the LinkPass to him and I explain again to the supervisor what happened. He repeats the story, and seems to understand. Then he says, "where's your card? Let's check it." And I pointed to his hand, which was holding my card and receipt, and said "you're holding it." The guy is like, "oh look at that! I am!" and starts to fiddle with the purchasing machine. Meanwhile the first employee is trying to talk to me about Powerball.

The manager stops fiddling turns to me and goes, "You have $8.30 left on this card. It should work fine." I had to go through the whole thing again about how I have a LinkPass "oh yeah! Look at that! The computer says you do have a LinkPass!" and how it magically stopped working when I tried to enter today.

10 minutes later, the manager is like, "I can't help you, you have to go to the sales center at Downtown Crossing tomorrow." By now it's 6:20, and I had told Al I would be in Davis between 6:15 and 6:30. So I rush to the train, and the driver proceeds to drive approximately as slow as possible between every redline station. I arrive at Davis at 6:40, find Al has left because he thinks I stood him up (I didn't have his number somehow). So I order and eat fast, email Al from my smartphone to apologize and run back to the train at Davis in time to make it Porter by 7:15, so my bandmate could pick me up and drive me to the hinterlands of North Cambridge for rehearsal.

Here's the kicker. The card somehow reset the LinkPass itself. I entered Davis and it gave me the "good until 1/31/07" reading that you get with a pass. So at Porter I checked the machine, and lo and behold it still had $8.30 on it, meaning it didn't deduct cash when I entered at Davis – meaning it recognized my pass! When I enter Porter after rehearsal, it has the same result. Now I'm really mad. I wasted $10, missed dinner with a friend and subsequently looked like a complete jerk, rushed around and scarfed my dinner down and generally was crazy for no good reason. The pass works fine today (two days later) too.

I still have no idea whether it was my card's fault, or the fault of every single turnstile at South Station, or just an MBTA poltergeist that decided to ruin my day
You are not the first person to write that their LinkPass "vanished" only to reappear. The cards are designed to have three "wallets" embedded on the chip. One is for "stored value", the other 2 are designed for passes so the card can have February's pass already on it even though the January pass is still valid. There is also a part of the chip that stores transfers.

The T never had the chance to fully beta test the pass part of the CharlieCard when they made the Senior/Disabled passes into smartcards 18 months ago because all the stations had not been converted. Hopefully this bugs are minor and will work themselves out in the next month or two. But it would probably be a good idea to get a receipt when you buy a pass and keep it with you.

R from Somerville sees strange behavior in a bus driver
Most of the T bus drivers I've seen in Somerville are okay folks. In
the past few years I've had some interesting conversations with a few
of the local drivers on the 90 and 88. This morning, though, I watched
a real winner on the 94 forcing the car ahead of it to break the law.

It happened on College Ave, heading in towards Davis. The traffic was
stopped at the red light and backed up all the way to the library.
There was a compact car in the left lane at the corner of College Ave
and Winter Street (the one-way that goes between the Store 18 and the
block with the realty agency and Deli-icious.) The car was stopped at
the legal stop line well ahead of the vehicle in front of it, keeping
the intersection free for anybody who needed to turn onto Winter
Street. Only problem was, the 94 bus was behind this car and was
growing impatient in the face of the red light.

It began to honk at the car. First briefly, then consistently. It
wanted the car to move ahead and block the intersection, even though
there's a sign right there on the corner that says DO NOT BLOCK
INTERSECTION. Cars travelling north on College Ave who want to make a
left onto Winter will often find jackasses blocking the intersection,
and they hold up traffic behind them while the southbound traffic
clears enough for them to make the turn. The compact car was obeying
the law and following the rules and keeping that intersection clear,
but this wasn't good enough for the 94 bus. It leaned on its horn as
it loomed behind the tiny car. The compact driver finally relented and
pulled ahead into the forbidden spot. This pleased the 94 bus, for it
quickly swung out into the right-hand lane and sped over to the Store
18 stop.

I realize there's commuters on that bus waiting to get to the bus
stop. But the bus has to obey all traffic laws to get to that stop --
and it certainly can't force other vehicles to break the traffic laws.
And honestly, if it knew it would have to get to that bus stop, it
should've been in the damn right hand lane to begin with.

I feel bad for the driver of the compact car, who was unnecessarily
hassled and forced to do something they didn't want to do. In the
grand scheme of things this isn't such a bad infraction, but it's bad
driving habits to begin with and shouldn't be encouraged. I don't know
if I'd have felt annoyed this way towards the honking vehicle if it
had been like a regular pick-up truck or something, but it did rub me
the wrong way this morning.
What can I say? There are good drivers and bad ones. I have had one driver tell me that he feels a little pressure because of the GPS tracking system on the bus that displays how early or late he is at all times and then issues a report at the end of the shift on how the driver performed with the schedule. Still I think any of of who drive know that Boston is the perfect example of the "butterfly effect" where a fender bender in Quincy can cause a backup in Medford. It is easy to schedule trains and trolleys but a bus is not master of its domain. So what I am saying is the driver should chill out and the T should not put undo pressure on drivers to maintain a schedule in traffic conditions they don't control.

keep the feedback coming, this is your forum. I'm just the bus driver.

Saturday, January 20, 2007

T Tales (January 20th edition)

The mailbag at charlieonthembta@gmail.com brings us this story from John


Here's a nice incident for your files. Friday I rode out of Boston on the Red Line with a co-worker. We arrived in Braintree at about 9:30pm. Where were seven passengers in the car, us and 5 high school kids.
Now all the way out of Boston at all the South Boston and Quincy stops all the doors worked fine. However, at Braintree, though other passengers seemed to be able to leave the train from their cars, on our car the doors didn't move. We stood by the doors waiting but long after station platform emptied, we remained locked in.
Finally, I pushed the emergency intercom and alarm button which glowed red and sounded a loud tone. Nothing happened for several minutes until a MBTA employee unlocked the inter-car door at the end of the car.
He stood in the doorway with a angry look and yelled (YELLED!) at us,"WHO PUSHED THE ALARM?!"
Flabbergasted, I yelled back,"We're locked in!!". To this he responded by turning around (without a word) closing the door and locking it. We never saw him again.

A couple of minutes later, by banging on the glass, we caught the attention of a another T employee who was leaving the platform. He immediately entered the train via the engineers compartment and was able to release a outside door. We thanked him and left.

I read that there is a new law that gives jerks (like the first T employee) the power to issue citations, thats a bad idea. He already likes to lockup T passengers at his whim.

John for the Braintree 7.

Sigh.

I had something happen several years ago at Alewife. The doors never opened in our car and we also pressed the intercom. But nobody could hear it as the crew was switching ends and walking on the platform. The bell rang and suddenly we heading back to Davis where we finally got off and we are talking seven passengers involved.

I suppose we should consider ourselves lucky in Boston that we still have 2 man crews on the Red and Orange Lines to watch out for things on the train but sometimes it doesn't matter. Chicago eliminated conductors on trains about 10 years ago and if you are in the rear cars you really are on your own, but at least in Chicago you can pass from car to car which is something Boston has never allowed. I hope we never have to find out how well these crews are trained for an emergency. The T came under heavy criticism 30 years ago when there was complete mayhem in the tunnel between Park Street and Charles when THREE (yes 3) Red Line trains collided. Because of what happened that day in 1975 the crews were given more training but still one wonders how much.

Sam writes


Hey, Charlie!

Thanks for the blog! I've been riding the T for years and recently started to wonder more about how it operates, the history, etc. Your blog came along at exactly the right time for me!

Thanks for providing such a wealth of information and shedding light on a fairly in-transparent system.

I have not been able to find an "about" section on the blog however and I'm wondering who you are and how you come to be interested in, so knowledgeable about, and seemingly plugged into the T's workings, present and past. Does it somehow overlap with your job?

I'm also wondering if you have had feedback/contact from the MBTA about the blog.

Thanks again,

Sam

No Sam I have no connection with the T other than I have been riding it for more years than I want to admit. ( I remember when the Bluebirds on the Cambridge-Dorchester line were new) Over the years as I traveled to other cities and compared transit systems I would often wonder why the T did things the way they do and now the blog is an extension of that. I have been told the T is aware we exist.



One thing that always needs to be remembered when comparing the T to other cities is the age of the system downtown where the core tunnels are now 100 years old. Yes we can marvel at subways in Montreal, Oakland-San Francisco, Washington and Atlanta but they were built in the 60's and 70's and learned from the problems cities like Boston and Philadelphia had. It is better to compare the T to similar systems in Philadelphia and Chicago and Boston overall looks pretty good compared to those 2 cities. Chicago and Philadelphia let their subway stations deteriorate in a fashion that never happened here and only now is Chicago undergoing a major station renovation program. One Loop station in particular stood out as being horrific, the one at Grand and State which is heavily used by passengers going to Navy Pier. It is not uncommon to be waiting for a train with a rat sniffing at your feet. There was a joke in Chicago among passengers when the CTA converted all trains to automated announcements in 2000 and the computer voice ( known as Mr. Happy CTA guy by the locals ) would happily announce "This is Grand" as the train chugged into the dungeon of a station. The CTA this past summer finally changed the announcement to say "This is Grand and State"

The MBTA will never be like BART or the Washington Metro but it can be better.