
The day after the
mooninite invasion there are far more questions than answers. But there is one question that should be front and center and so far the media has been ignoring it.
How could someone install a device 20 feet above a busway without anybody seeing anything?????Peter Berdovsky and
Sean Stevens may have done the City of Boston more good than harm when they installed those 38 lite brite devices all over the city because it exposes just how vulnerable we are to someone who would really want to hurt us.
Think about it.
Nobody saw or reported anything amiss when these "ads" were deployed. Nobody thought anything was unusual.
THAT should frighten Mayor Menino and Governor Patrick far more than what actually happened yesterday. Peter and Sean could have been planting explosives just as easily as the lite brites. Every security measure implemented after 9/11
FAILED in this case and the Mayor and Governor instead of screaming at Turner Broadcasting should instead look in the mirror and ask
'how did we allow this to happen'. Don't think this hasn't gone unnoticed by real terrorist who now could think it would be easier to launch an attack against the city.
Then at the next level there are so many questions to be asked that you almost don't know where to begin. Just take the simple fact that these devices were sitting around for TWO WEEKS before anybody in authority really noticed them. For 2 weeks the Boston Police didn't notice this strange light on an overpass?

or this?
8 comments:
They probably put the blinky device up between 1 and 5 am, when there is no bus, Orange Line, or commuter train traffic through that area. Nobody would be around there to notice since it's neither a business nor a residential area.
I think the more pertinent issue at Sullivan is how easy it is to access the supports for a major highway from the station.
I see your point. The bad guys could plant some nasty stuff in the dead of night and nobody would know.
SO if they are so proud of themselves, why not show their faces?
I think we can say the company, was in the wrong, and the city of Boston was in the right. I so want to 'do an art project' on those two.
I don't think we can see these two guys are in the wrong, and maybe not their bosses either. (though the Globe has some troubling info about the Marketing firm) And I don't think its fair to say Boston's purely in the right. I think the initial response was appropriate but the continued and increasing panic through the rest of the day wasn't justified. Further, suggesting that anyone was trying to incite panic and charging two artists with such is completely uncalled for and really just distracts us from real concerns that should be drawn from these events.
At most, the two artists were guilty of minor misdemeanors like vandalism or trespassing --- certainly not anything felonious like intentionally planting hoax bombs.
Did 9/11 change everything? Yeah, but it was five and half years ago. Time to change back.
Did 9/11 change everything? Yeah, but it was five and half years ago. Time to change back.
There is a guy in a cave that wants exactly that
All you people saying that we should be throwing these people in jail cause it could have been a bomb need to realize that if we live in fear of terrorists they have already won. And from some of the comments here they have won.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
Post a Comment