
.
The university's 50-year master plan, submitted to Boston planning officials today, also calls for putting 20 acres of Soldiers Field Road underground in order to keep traffic out of view and replace surface roadway with tree-lined promenades.
Harvard officials said the project is likely to cost several billion dollars. The first phases, including a major science building and a museum that would house collections now at Harvard's Fogg and other art museums, are expected to get underway before year's end.
If you look at Page 42 of the master plan Harvard is asking the T for more frequent service on bus routes 66 and 86 (no mention of the 70) and possibly including Allston in the proposed "Urban Ring" transit corridor the T has dreamed about for years.
One thing is certain. Harvard WILL proceed with this project and the T has to address the transit challenges it will bring in very short order. For the transit dreamers this project opens any number of possibilities for T expansion. For example you could consider expanding the Blue Line to go through Lechmere or Kendall, continue on to Inman, through Harvard and under the Charles to Allston, Coolidge Corner, Brigham Circle to Dudley. Splitting the Red Line at Harvard is another possibility.
In any event the clock started to tick when Harvard announced their plans. The T needs to start working on this project now and with the clout of Harvard University behind it the long dreamed crosstown subway can become a reality.
3 comments:
Why should Harvard wait on promises from the T before beginning its expansion/revitalization. It already owns half of Boston and Cambridge anyway and has shown it can do whatever it wants with the land--why not just expand on its own public transit service?
I feel sorry in advance for the unfortunate undergraduates who will be forced to live in this barren, inconvenient new campus.
And a fake replica of Harvard Square that will be artificially constructed by Harvard's high-paid architects? What are they smoking?
Before we build a subway to replace the 86, 66, and 15 buses, why don't we build one where it's actually needed? Like along the B line, and the 39, 57, 28, 1, and 111 buses.
Post a Comment